PURUSH AAYOG : DELHI SAMANVAY SAMITI HELPS CLOSE CAW CELL COMPLAINT BY WIFE IN DELHI : READ THE STEPS

CAW CELL DELHI | MenCell.Org Delhi: Complaint के बाद complainant investigation में cooperate न करे तो?

A CAW Cell Delhi complaint does not mean that the investigation can simply run on allegations alone.

There is another side of the process that families often don't think about: What happens when the complainant herself does not cooperate with the investigation?

In Kritika Kaushik v. State, decided by the Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Shahdara, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi on 22 May 2026, the complainant had approached the CAW Cell before leaving India for the USA. FIR No. 264/2023 of PS Farsh Bazar was registered under matrimonial-cruelty provisions.

During investigation, however, the record showed a very different problem.

The Investigating Officer issued notices seeking information and supporting material, including specific dates, particulars of alleged incidents and bills relating to the dowry list. The complainant did not respond to the Section 91 CrPC notices and did not join the investigation.

The IO eventually filed a closure/cancellation report, citing the complainant's failure to participate and provide the requested corroborative material.

And then came another important stage.

The Trial Court supplied the closure report and gave the complainant opportunities to participate, including the option of appearing through video conferencing because she was living in the USA.

The court record states that she did not appear despite directions and also did not file a protest petition within the opportunities provided. The Trial Court consequently accepted the closure report.

The matter then reached the Sessions Court in revision.

The Sessions Court examined the procedural history and held that there was no apparent illegality or impropriety in the Trial Court's order. The revision was dismissed.

For someone dealing with CAW Cell Delhi, Crime (Women) Cell, a matrimonial FIR or a Delhi NCR 498A/406-type proceeding, this creates a very different point to understand:

Complaint करना और investigation को prove करने योग्य material देना — दोनों अलग बातें हैं.

A husband or family facing a matrimonial complaint should therefore preserve the investigation record carefully:

CAW Cell complaint → notices from IO → documents demanded → replies → statements → investigation proceedings → final report/chargesheet/closure report.

Don't simply assume that the first complaint is the entire story.

And if the police asks for a document, statement or specific information, the actual notice and response should be preserved. Later, those records may become important when the court examines what happened during investigation.

This is particularly important where the parties are living outside Delhi, outside India, or in different parts of Delhi NCR. Distance does not automatically end the procedural obligations connected with a pending investigation.

क्योंकि बाद में यह कहना कि “मुझे मौका नहीं मिला” और record में repeated notices दिखाई देना — दोनों बिल्कुल अलग situations हो सकती हैं.

For husbands and families dealing with CAW Cell Nanakpura, CAW Cell Seema Puri, CAW Cell West District or another Crime (Women) Cell matter, don't wait until a closure report, chargesheet or court proceeding appears before reconstructing the investigation record.

जो notice आज छोटा लगता है, वही कल court record का important हिस्सा बन सकता है.

WhatsApp: 9873540498 — message only to book an appointment.

Phone Consultation | 1-on-1 Google Meet Consultation | Personal On-Site Consultation in Delhi & Delhi-NCR

MenCell.org
https://mencell.org

Men Cell Delhi / Mencell Delhi
https://mencelldelhi.mencell.org

Purush Aayog Delhi / Atur Chatur Counselling
https://www.aturchatur.com/2015/05/atur-chatur-counselling.html

Through MenCell.Org, I use lawful methods including judicial activism, RTI activism, document analysis and procedural research to examine the available record and develop a practical case strategy. Paid one-to-one consultations are available through Google Meet and phone. I also provide on-site visits to your home, office or another convenient location across Delhi & Delhi NCR.

Case-specific caution: Kritika Kaushik v. State turned on its own investigation record, notices, opportunities provided by the Trial Court and the complainant's conduct in that particular case. It does not mean that every closure report following a CAW Cell complaint will automatically be upheld. The reasons for non-cooperation, material collected during investigation and the procedure followed by the investigating agency must be examined case by case.

PURUSH AAYOG DELHI : How a Poorly a drafted RTI Can Destroy Your Case in CAW Cells of Delhi?

CAW CELL DELHI | MenCell.Org Delhi: Complaint की copy चाहिए? RTI में क्या मिलेगा?

CAW Cell में complaint हो गई और आपको पता ही नहीं कि record में क्या लिखा गया है?

यहीं से एक अलग तरह की problem शुरू हो सकती है.

A 31 August 2026 Central Information Commission decision in Santosh K. Talwar v. Delhi Police, Second Appeal No. CIC/DEPOL/A/2025/137784, dealt with an RTI application arising from a matrimonial criminal case.

The appellant had sought information concerning a complaint made by his daughter-in-law and the subsequent police action.

He specifically sought:

the complaint, FIR, action taken on his emails, supporting evidence/statements, police SOPs and information regarding due diligence before registration of the FIR.

The matter concerned PS North Rohini, Delhi, and the police record referred to a CAW Cell/Rohini enquiry followed by registration of an FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC.

The important part is what happened to the RTI request.

The police provided the appellant with copies of the complaint, FIR and action-taken material, while information concerning evidence and witness statements collected during the investigation was denied by invoking Section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act, on the ground that disclosure could impede the investigation.

The CIC did not simply say:

“RTI डाल दी है, अब पूरा police file मिल जाएगा.”

No.

The decision shows why an RTI request in a CAW CELL DELHI matter has to be drafted carefully.

There can be a difference between:

Complaint / FIR / available action-taken records

and

investigation material, witness statements and other records whose disclosure may attract a statutory exemption.

The CIC ultimately directed the CPIO to revisit the records concerning the action taken on the appellant's emails and provide a revised reply, including any additional available information, free of cost; if no additional information existed, that also had to be stated.

This is a very practical point for a husband or family member facing a CAW Cell Delhi complaint.

RTI is not just about asking “give me everything.”

The better approach is to identify:

Which record?
Which date?
Which officer/authority?
What action was taken?
What document is actually available?
If information is denied, under which RTI exemption?

और अगर reply में सिर्फ लिखा है “information cannot be provided”, बिना relevant statutory provision properly explaining the denial, that itself deserves examination.

The CIC has dealt with similar CAW Cell RTI disputes, including requests for hearing/order records and police-held documents.

For someone dealing with CAW CELL DELHI, CAW Cell Nanakpura, CAW Cell Seema Puri, Crime (Women) Cell Delhi or matrimonial proceedings in Delhi NCR, preserving the documentary trail can become extremely important.

Complaint से FIR तक क्या हुआ?
किस date को क्या action हुआ?
किस document पर police relied?
किस information को RTI में दिया गया और किसे रोका गया?

इन questions का answer बाद में case strategy में फर्क डाल सकता है.

घबराकर police record के बारे में assumptions मत बनाइए. Record को legally और systematically trace कीजिए.

Through MenCell.Org, built over nearly two decades, I use judicial activism, RTI activism and other lawful methods to examine procedural problems and build a case strategy.

If you or your family are facing a CAW CELL DELHI complaint or matrimonial FIR, don't wait until the proceedings have moved far ahead before checking what documentary record actually exists.

Paid one-to-one consultation through Google Meet is available.

I also provide on-site visits to your home, office or another convenient location across Delhi & Delhi NCR.

Appointment booking and WhatsApp consultation:

MenCell.Org | Men Cell Delhi | Atur Chatur Counselling

WhatsApp: 9873540498 — message only to book an appointment.

क्योंकि matrimonial case में कभी-कभी सबसे बड़ा सवाल यह नहीं होता कि complaint में क्या कहा गया — बल्कि यह होता है कि official record में आखिर दर्ज क्या है.

PURUSH AAYOG DELHI : New Name in Chargesheet Which Was Not In FIR!! How To Close False Charge Sheet By Police?

CAW CELL DELHI | MenCell.Org Delhi: Chargesheet में गलत family member को 406? फिर क्या होगा?

“Complaint में किसी और का नाम था… लेकिन chargesheet में 406 किसी और पर?”

यह सिर्फ paperwork की छोटी गलती समझकर ignore करने वाली बात नहीं हो सकती.

A 7 August 2026 Delhi High Court judgment in XXXXXXXXXXX v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors., CRL.M.C. 1781/2025, examined a matrimonial FIR arising from a CAW Cell complaint.

The FIR was registered as FIR No. 364/2019 at P.S. Dwarka South under Sections 498A/406/377/509/34 IPC.

The matrimonial dispute involved allegations relating to dowry, cruelty, jewellery/stridhan and other serious allegations.

But the Section 406 allegation had a very specific problem.

The Trial Court noticed that the allegation of entrustment of jewellery was actually directed against Madhu Chopra, while the chargesheet had been filed against Aditya Chopra for Section 406.

The Court also noted that the material did not clearly establish the necessary entrustment or dishonest misappropriation against the person charged under Section 406.

The accused persons were therefore discharged on that count.

And the matter did not end there.

The complainant challenged the discharge before the Sessions Court and then approached the Delhi High Court.

The High Court refused to interfere.

Why?

Because at the stage of framing of charge, the Court has to examine whether the material collected during investigation raises a prima facie case or grave suspicion.

But where the material does not disclose the basic ingredients of the particular offence, a person should not be forced into a criminal trial merely because his or her name appears somewhere in the matrimonial dispute.

यह point husbands और in-laws के लिए बहुत important है.

A CAW CELL DELHI complaint may contain allegations against several family members.

But the next question should be:

किस accused के खिलाफ कौन-सा allegation है?

Then:

उस allegation को support करने वाला material किसके against है?

And finally:

Chargesheet में वही person और वही offence correctly connected हैं या नहीं?

In this case, the Delhi High Court specifically noted the mismatch concerning Section 406 and the person against whom the entrustment allegation had actually been made.

This is why a husband or family member facing CAW Cell Delhi, CAW Cell Nanakpura, CAW Cell Seema Puri or another Crime (Women) Cell proceeding in Delhi NCR should not read the FIR and chargesheet casually.

नाम आ जाना और किसी specific offence के ingredients legally disclosed होना — अलग बातें हैं.

There is another important caution.

The Court did not say that every allegation in the case was false.

It examined whether the material collected during investigation satisfied the legal threshold required for the respective offences.

In fact, the High Court also explained that its jurisdiction under Section 528 BNSS is not meant to replace the findings of the Trial Court and Revisional Court with a fresh appreciation of evidence.

So the practical lesson is:

FIR पढ़िए.
Chargesheet पढ़िए.
Statements पढ़िए.
Documents देखिए.
फिर accused-by-accused analysis कीजिए.

Don't simply assume:

“पूरा family नामजद है, तो सबको same criminal liability होगी.”

That assumption can become extremely important once the case reaches the charge stage.

Through MenCell.Org, built over nearly two decades, I use judicial activism, RTI activism and other lawful methods to examine procedural problems and build a case strategy.

If your family has already received a CAW CELL DELHI complaint, FIR, chargesheet or court notice, don't wait until the trial has progressed substantially before examining what exactly has been alleged against each person.

Paid one-to-one consultation through Google Meet is available.

I also provide on-site visits to your home, office or another convenient location across Delhi & Delhi NCR.

Appointment booking and WhatsApp consultation:

MenCell.Org | Men Cell Delhi | Atur Chatur Counselling

WhatsApp: 9873540498 — message only to book an appointment.

घबराकर सबको एक ही जवाब देना आसान है.
लेकिन criminal case में कभी-कभी सबसे important सवाल होता है — allegation किसके खिलाफ है, और chargesheet ने किसे charge किया है?

Delhi NRI Husband: Dubai Salary को देखकर Maintenance तय होगी?

“He earns in Dubai, so just convert his salary into ₹ and calculate maintenance.”

क्या matrimonial litigation इतना simple है?

A recent Delhi High Court judgment dated 16 February 2026 gives NRI husbands an important case study.

In Rakesh Ray v. Priti Ray, the matrimonial dispute involved proceedings before the CAW Cell, Delhi, proceedings under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, and a maintenance claim for the wife and minor child.

The husband was earning abroad.

And this became an important question:

Should foreign income simply be converted into Indian rupees and treated as if the husband is earning and spending in India?

The Delhi High Court discussed this issue in detail.

The Court referred to the earlier Delhi High Court decision in Bindu Chaudhary v. Deepak Suga, concerning a husband earning in Dubai, and observed that where a person earns in a foreign country, his income AND expenditure are both in that foreign currency.

Therefore, according to the Court, the cost of living in the country of employment cannot simply be ignored.

This matters enormously for an NRI husband in Delhi matrimonial proceedings.

Because there is a huge difference between:

“He earns ₹X lakh after conversion.”

and

“He earns X dirhams/dollars, pays foreign rent, transport, insurance, food, taxes and other employment-related expenses, and has the remaining disposable income.”

लेकिन यहाँ एक और important point है.

This is not a rule saying that every NRI husband will automatically get a lower maintenance order.

It means the Court has to examine the actual financial circumstances.

So if you are an NRI husband:

Don't merely tell your advocate:

“My salary is in Dubai.”

Build the evidence.

Employment contract.

Salary slips.

Bank statements.

Rent.

Insurance.

Taxes.

Utilities.

Travel.

Employment-related expenditure.

Existing liabilities.

Indian assets.

Foreign assets where relevant.

And the actual financial needs of the child.

Because matrimonial litigation is not won by saying:

“I earn abroad.”

It is also not necessarily answered by saying:

“His foreign salary is huge.”

The real question is:

What does the evidence actually show?

And this is where many NRI husbands make a serious mistake.

They remain abroad.

They send a few documents to an advocate.

They attend a hearing through VC.

They assume:

“Lawyer sab manage kar lega.”

Months later, they discover that an incomplete financial picture has already entered the record.

Then comes the difficult question:

“Why wasn't this evidence filed earlier?”

यही वजह है कि Delhi CAW Cell proceedings, Delhi matrimonial cases, maintenance proceedings, DV proceedings and NRI husband disputes should not be treated as routine paperwork.

Your foreign salary is only one part of the story.

Your foreign cost of living can also become part of the story.

And your documents should tell that story properly.

Through MenCell.Org, built over nearly two decades, I use judicial activism, RTI activism and other lawful methods to examine procedural problems and build a case strategy.

If you are an NRI husband in Delhi/NCR facing CAW Cell proceedings, matrimonial litigation, maintenance claims, DV proceedings, Court notices, mediation, counselling, conciliation or questions about your foreign income and expenses, a casual “मेरे lawyer देख लेंगे” approach can leave important facts outside the record.

Paid one-to-one consultations are available through Google Meet.

I can also visit your home, office or another convenient location across Delhi & Delhi NCR.

Appointment booking and WhatsApp consultation are available through MenCell.Org.

WhatsApp: 9873540498 — message only to book an appointment.

NRI income को सिर्फ rupees में मत देखिए.

पूरा financial picture देखिए.

Because in an NRI matrimonial case, salary conversion is only the beginning — evidence is what tells the complete story.

Case Study:

Rakesh Ray v. Priti Ray

Delhi High Court

Judgment pronounced: 16 February 2026

CRL.REV.P. 718/2024 & connected matters

THE FIR WAS STILL ALIVE — BUT THE MARRIAGE HAD COME BACK

Sometimes a matrimonial criminal case reaches a very different stage from the one at which it began.

A complaint is filed.

An FIR follows.

The spouses separate.

And then, unexpectedly, they start living together again.

That is what happened in a recent Delhi High Court matter.

THE CASE

In Rajat Kumar Bharti & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr., decided on 14 September 2026, the FIR had been registered at Police Station Prem Nagar, Delhi under Sections 498A, 406 and 34 IPC.

The complaint had been made by the wife. The petitioners included her husband, mother-in-law and married sisters-in-law.

But circumstances had subsequently changed.

The wife told the Court that she had settled the matrimonial disputes, had been living with her husband and their 18-year-old son for about two years, and no longer wished to prosecute the petitioners.

THE IMPORTANT POINT

The Delhi High Court did not simply rely upon a lawyer's statement.

The Court interacted with the wife, recorded that she confirmed the settlement and reconciliation, and then concluded that continuing the criminal proceedings would not serve the interests of justice.

The FIR and the proceedings arising from it were consequently quashed.

That distinction is important.

The order does not declare that the original allegations were false.

It records what had happened subsequently: the matrimonial relationship had been restored, the parties had settled their disputes, and the complainant herself did not want the prosecution to continue.

WHAT IF YOU ARE THE HUSBAND?

Imagine a Delhi professional who has spent years building his career.

Suddenly there is a CAW Cell complaint.

Then an FIR.

Then lawyers, court dates and family pressure.

But months or years later, the spouses reconcile.

What happens to the criminal case?

This judgment shows why the answer cannot be found merely by searching:

“How do I cancel my FIR?”

The actual history matters:

Was there a genuine settlement?

Are the parties living together again?

What does the complainant herself say before the Court?

What proceedings are still pending?

What documents record the settlement or reconciliation?

WHY PEOPLE SEARCH PURUSH AAYOG DELHI OR MEN CELL DELHI

Someone searching Purush Aayog Delhi, Men Cell Delhi, Man Cell Delhi, or CAW Cell Delhi may be dealing with a matrimonial case that has changed substantially since the original complaint.

The sensible approach is to examine the present legal position, not merely the circumstances that existed when the dispute began.

For a Delhi or Delhi-NCR matter, consultation can begin through:

WhatsApp: 9873540498

Phone and Google Meet consultation are available, along with personal/on-site consultation in Delhi & Delhi-NCR where appropriate.

Men Cell Delhi:

https://mencelldelhi.mencell.org

Men Cell / Purush Aayog:

https://mencell.org

Atur Chatur Counselling:

https://www.aturchatur.com/2015/05/atur-chatur-counselling.html

The practical lesson from this order is simple:

A matrimonial criminal case should be examined according to its present circumstances, the settlement position and the actual statements made before the Court.

A complaint may have started the story.

But it is not necessarily the end of the story.

Delhi High Court | 14 September 2026 | Rajat Kumar Bharti | CAW Cell Delhi | PS Prem Nagar | 498A | Matrimonial Settlement | Reconciliation | FIR Quashing | Purush Aayog Delhi | Men Cell Delhi | Delhi-NCR | 9873540498

PURUSH AAYOG : NRI husband's perspective } 9873540498

NRI husbands face unique challenges in the legal system when dealing with false cases and misuse of laws such as 498A. While there are resources available for women, such as the Women's Cell and the National Commission for Women, there is a lack of support for NRI husbands. The creation of an NRI Men's Cell in Delhi, as proposed by Atyur Chatur, could provide much-needed assistance and advocacy for NRI husbands.

NRI husbands face a number of challenges when dealing with false cases and misuse of laws. False allegations of dowry harassment, domestic violence, and other crimes can lead to arrest and imprisonment, as well as financial and emotional distress. Unfortunately, many NRI husbands are unable to defend themselves effectively in court due to the distance and financial costs involved.

The NRI Men's Cell proposed by Atyur Chatur would provide a valuable resource for NRI husbands. The cell could offer legal assistance, advocacy, and support for NRI husbands facing false cases and other legal challenges. By providing a voice for NRI husbands, the NRI Men's Cell could help to level the playing field in the legal system and ensure that justice is served.

In addition to supporting NRI husbands, the NRI Men's Cell could also work to promote awareness of the unique challenges faced by NRI husbands. By educating the public about the issues facing NRI husbands, the cell could help to reduce discrimination and bias against NRI husbands in the legal system.

In conclusion, NRI husbands face significant challenges in the legal system when dealing with false cases and misuse of laws. The creation of an NRI Men's Cell in Delhi could provide much-needed support and advocacy for NRI husbands, and help to promote awareness of the unique challenges facing this group.

To counter this, NRIs need a specialized cell that deals with their unique problems. The NRI Men Cell in Delhi is one such organization that helps NRIs deal with legal issues related to family disputes, property, and other related matters. The NRI Men Cell works to create awareness among NRIs about their legal rights and provides legal assistance to those who need it.

In addition to legal assistance, the NRI Men Cell also works to create a support system for NRIs. The organization has a helpline that NRIs can call for advice and support. The helpline is available 24/7, and the organization has a team of volunteers who can provide assistance in multiple languages.

The NRI Men Cell also provides counseling services to NRIs who are going through emotional turmoil due to family disputes. The counseling services are aimed at helping NRIs cope with the stress and anxiety that come with such disputes. The organization also provides support to NRIs who are victims of false dowry and domestic violence cases.

In conclusion, while women have several organizations and legal provisions to protect their rights, men, especially NRIs, have very few options. The need for a Purush Aayog or an NRI Men Cell is becoming increasingly important as more and more men face false cases, biased legal systems, and corrupt cops and lawyers. It is high time that the Indian legal system acknowledges the discrimination faced by men and takes concrete steps to protect their rights. The establishment of a Purush Aayog or an NRI Men Cell would be a step in the right direction, and it would go a long way in creating a more just and equitable society.

Call:- 9873540498 

purush aayog

purush aayog
men welfare commission looks after the betterment of men, boys, husbands and old aged men left by their own sons and daughters and their spouses but the big question is about the validity of purush aayog in India as there are women welfare, children welfare commissions and also social development welfare commissions which do have protection officers to help provide shelter to any women or child being sufferer of domestic violence, but are men not covered under social welfare schemes, is a man not entitled to his welfare services by the government of India and what would be the fate of a man if his wife gives him slow poison. is there a law to protect men from harassment by his wife or by any other girl in India
similarly, if any girl hits her boyfriend on his head and boy suffers head injuries then this comes under physical assault and even sections of sexual assault may be added to it, but what is the vice versa happens. will the society give same punishment to the girl in question if she hits the boy. ok, this may comes under physical assault, but won't the girl allege that she did this in self defence as we have seen cases where the murderer woman has been let gone just because she told the court that she murderer her attacker in self defence. what would purush aayog do in such cases? do men need protection too? and where are the feminists now when a man or boy or an old father in law is assaulted or charged with false rape charge or sexual assault charge?
purush aayog is required as contended by the men rights protesters in India but these protests are not worth it as purush aayog will never be formed in India but men must learn about how to cancel FIR instead of joining or wasting your time seeking for purush aayog in India because the right to information act has given men the power to fight out false crpc 125 cases by filing rti to fight false maintenance case so that the boys do learn ways to fight and close false cases without signing vakalatnama before any advocate and contacting the men cell helpline number so that perjury, right to information act and crpc 91 production of documents or order XI rule 14 summons for production of documents may b e issued to the opposite party wife and her employers, telecom operators etc to catch her lies, only this way these false multifarious cases on men / husbands may be reduced and the NRI husbands' trauma of false cases and immigration issues will end in India.

like purush aayog helps men through expertise of atur chatur type 498a consultants in delhi. similarly, for the right to information act, one may contact rti consultant delhi to file RTI's back to back on several issues in order to catch the lies of the wife in a matrimonial dispute and based on these evidences file for arrest warrant against wife in the same court or same DV court where she has sought relief by filing false 498a or false DV case against her husband. similarly, man cell purush aayog helpline number may offer services to a husband in strengthening the case in court so that wife is roped in her own false allegations via perjury and defamation suits (evidence based suits) as compared to wild and bald allegations of the wife. 

even a judge of lower court or upper courts in punishable for trapping a man/ husband in false litigation but all this is never done to file defamation suit against the tormentor judge or metropolitan magistrate as purush aayog protesters never guide men about any such cases which can be filed against a judge in order to stop the judge from passing illegal order against the husband however aturchatur's purush aayog in delhi may suggest a husband to file rti to fight false maintenance case so that the road to compromise of false 498a gets smooth for the rti activists in delhi in such a manner that rather than these harassed men looking here and there for filing complaint against wife in man cell they start learning just very few tactics to frame the wife in her own allegations in such a manner that even the corrupt police investigating officer or the misleading or grafting based MM or JFC/PJ of lower court is unable to frame falkse charges against men / husbands in India which will end the legal extortion of even the NRI husbands in India so that these non resident Indian husbands live peacefully abroad without worrying about false cases in India and thereby closing false 498a and false DV and maintenance cases without any advocate and without going to India.

this is the need of the hour because if the NRI is forced or mislead by his lawyer to come to India then first and foremost the NRI is asked to apply for bail and the NRI husband wonders as to How long does it take to get anticipatory bail in india? but rather than the time, what is more important is the fact that the bail and quash are futile exercises and these two almost always backfire on the husband or the non resident Indian husband as conditions will be imposed on such husband or NRI and even his passport may be impounded and travel restrictions may be imposed on him which will eventually eat away his career and his future chances of success and this entire game plan is what is called as legal extortion by atur chatur from purush aayog in delhi because they counsel a client about How to write a WS ? because written statement is required to submitted and this is also known as the reply in common parlance and the lawyer or even the top lawyer firm of India may not be that sound to write a counter attack WS as may be written by team purush aayog as they are not just sufferers of false 498a and other cases but they have themselves been the winners in their respective arena's by filing arrest warrant against wife in the DV court which court in itself is named as mahila court and the act in itself is known as the protection of women from DV Act and it's women here and not men, but if the purush aayog have themselves been successful in filing arrrest warrant against their wife, resulting in closing their own DV cases then how ell they can guide the men / husbands and NRI's in India learn ways to come out of this mess of false cases filed by wife or any other girl/lady therefore instead of allowing the court to declare the NRI as a proclaimed offender it would be better if the court is told by the NRI (without coming to India and without any advocate) that proclaimed offender can not be issued in matrimonial disputes and such type of guidance can only be provided by purush aayog team in delhi as they study the cases as all cases are different from each other and then they guide the men, boys and NRI husbands the ways to settlement of false 498a without physically reaching any purush aayog in delhi and without worrying about the immigration, deportation or extradition issues in India because the purush aayog address in delhi then guides man to learn ways to close false 498a by NRI without keeping any lawyer and without even by giving any power of attorney to any relative in India, and in such cases a rti consultant is the best guy to help these men rather than filing complaint against wife in man cell in delhi because in almost every state there may be found a purush aayog by atur chatur for instance in the state of rajasthan, one may find men cell in rajasthan and these men commissions are not as strong as the national commission for men in India but are certainly very much stronger when it comes to enforcement of the rights of men in India and this initiative by 498a consultants in delhi protects the husband and his relatives from false dowry cases by wife in such a manner that the wife is herself charged with counter cases on lines of defensive offense so that these boys or purush seeking purush helpline may visit the men cell maharashtra for those living in mumbai or maharashtra and like wise even in delhi there may be found a purush aayog working day and night for men like man cell delhi and similarly, every state almost has a purush helpline helpling men in distress and also men sufferers of domestic violence by their female relative in India like in the newly incoporated state of telangana in andhra pradesh one may find man cell in telangana which essentially guides the men in believing that even central information commission has to follow the rules of CIC otherwise a purush may file rti non compliance cic for enforcement of his case before CIC in delhi so that the men are not constantly harassed and frustrated and discriminated by these type of government machineris and here comes the big role of purush aayog helpline num,ber in delhi for which even petitions were started around 5-6 years back on change.org type world renowned websites at पेटीशन · atur chatur: man cell delhi so that the NRI husbands especially learn the tactice about how to quash summons against NRI and his relatives so that he is spared from this extortion racket which is almost becoming organized in entire India with passage of each day therefore like residents of mumbai or navi mumbai who are seeking address of purush aayog in mumbai maharashtra may visit man cell in mumbai thereby learning false 498a FIR cancellation tactics by filing perjury against the wife which helps them from not getting arrested or deported back to India and once a NRI husband gets the protection from arbitrary arrest he understands that nothing will happen to him and he will be able to close false cases without visiting India just by contacting purush aayog like delhi men cell and hence the law enforcement agencies should now get ready to correct the jails for women in India as men are getting empowered by knowledge supplied by atur chatur's purush aayog and do they really now need any ministry of men or national commission for men? NO is the answer. because now the PIP movement alongwith arrest warrant against wife movement should help close false cases against men, husbands and NRI's thereby putting legal and technical pressure on the courts to write judgments pushing such women behind the bars in India.